|
In the beginning...
It has to be said that in 1987 when
Sun introduced
the first SPARC based
computer, it certainly wasn't clear that SPARC was going to become the leading
hardware platform for serious server applications. At that time most computer
manufacturers were talking about introducing their own
RISC based computers.
The few which have survived as the engines of today's Unix derived computers
are:-
SPARC, HP's Precision
Architrecture, and Silicon
Graphics MIPS.
Some others continued as graphics or floating point accelerators:- such as the
transputer, and Intel's 860, and 960 RISC processors.
IBM's original PC-RT was abandoned and
replaced several years later with the much more successful PowerPC
chip family.
DEC's
Alpha
family also started much later. Many others vanished without trace once SPARC
became successful.
In 1987 Sun had already achieved a leading position in the Unix workstation
market with its two product lines based on
Motorola 68020,
and Intel 386 processor
technology. The
386i was
positioned as a lower cost, lower performance workstation compared to the
Motorola based Sun-3 family. The 386i's DOS emulation and ease of use feature
were calculated to entice users who might be intimidated by the cold shell of a
pure Unix machine. In fact, within a few years, Sun was to drop both
Intel and Motorola platforms and migrate its entire customer base to SPARC.
why did Sun and most other minicomputer oem's turn to RISC?
The market developments which encouraged all minicomputer oem's to look at
a RISC strategy at that time were:-
- designing their own RISC architectures offered minicomputer oem's the
attraction of breaking away from a dependence on the two main
manufacturers of microprocessor chips at the time (Intel and Motorola).
Systems vendors hoped to differentiate their products, which was difficult to do
when they all used the same processor chips. In 1986 over 90% of PC's used
Intel chips, and over 90% of workstations used Motorola chips. Today it's still
true that over 90% of PC's use Intel architecture chips, but the largest
proportion of Unix derived RISC systems actually runs on SPARC.
- the relatively low cost accessibility to semiconductor fabrication
using gate arrays. Chip manufacturers who needed high volumes to recoup their
capital investments of hundreds of millions of dollars (now billions) had
figured out a way of producing standard product families of chips called
gate arrays, which were
identical except for the last few steps of the production process which defined
the interconnections. This enabled computer systems companies to buy state
of the art fabrication by effectively buying batches of wafers on a time-share
basis from a few thousand dollars upwards, instead of the millions of dollars
required previously .
- the deskilling of the chip design process by sophisticated
computer aided design
(CAD) tools
enabled computer systems designers to design, test and simulate most of the
design stages at their workstations, without needing knowledge of the underlying
manufacturing process parameters. The software enabled designers to work at a
logic function-block level without having to worry too much about the realities
of interconnections, datapaths and process variations. This revolution in
hardware logic design was akin to the invention of high level programming
languages which enabled programmers to write their applications in terms of the
problem, rather than needing to know exactly how the computer was built or wired
together.
- the computer market had grown weary of the high costs of applications
obsolescence, as one generation of computer hardware and software replaced
another. Learning from the rapid technology changes in the early days of the
Intel architecture PC market, users were starting to appreciate that open systems standards
which were supported by many manufacturers helped increase choice and
performance while at the same time keeping a lid on costs. In the multi-user
application area, only one operating system - Unix - seemed to offer a safe
choice. The proprietary alternatives from market leaders DEC and IBM, were very
capable, but had a higher entry cost. For vendors, the simplicity of
licensing and porting Unix onto their own hardware gave many small computer
companies the ability to offer serious competitive alternatives to the low and
mid range computers being sold by their much larger competitors on proprietary
platforms.
The SPARC Product Directory
has traced many of the historical developments in this market. Here are some of
the highlights. See dates below.
1996 perspective
At the end of 1996, we observe that the SPARC systems market has grown
seriously large.
The 1996/97 edition of the SPARC Product Directory contained nearly twice as
many pages, more than four times as many products, and twice as many suppliers
as our first edition. All the indicators we see suggest that this growth in
the SPARC market will continue.
The availability of two competing 64 bit CPU SPARC chip sets (UltraSPARC
from Sun
Microelectronics, and SPARC64 from Fujitsu owned HAL Computer) clearly
demonstrates that SPARC has reached a market size which will continue to attract
competitive products even at the cutting edge of technology and performance for
another decade.
SPARC is more than just an "Open" architecture. SPARC is a good
place to look for anyone looking beyond the performance envelope of a desktop
PC. The breadth of performance covers the full spectrum from portables to
supercomputers. The range of hardware interfaces and connectivity options is
unsurpassed. The applications experience represented by over 12,000 Solaris
applications packages and the largest installed base of multi-processor servers
makes SPARC the safe choice for your seriously complex computing application.
Sun's policy of licensing technology and encouraging other oem's to use Sun
developed interfaces means there's always a competitive choice for your next
SPARC project.
During the first decade of SPARC systems, price, as well as
performance
increased in scalability. At the start of the decade in 1987 you could
expect to pay about $40,000 for a usable SPARC based system. If you paid more,
then what you got was more I/O, RAM or disk, but the processor power was
restricted to a single CPU. By the end of 1996 a high end SPARC mainframe could
cost over $1M, while at the low end, you could get a desktop SPARC based
webterminal, the JavaStation for under $1,000. |
The chronology below lists some of the significant events in the first
decade of SPARC systems. With a pool of thousands of subjects we could have
chosen from, we apologize to anyone involved with products or events we've left
out. If you would like to nominate your own products, please send an email to
ACSL subject: SPARC history, and we'll consider adding them in, or creating an
alternative reader inspired history page.
- Sun introduced the the first SPARC based computer the Sun-4. This
was a VME bus based machine and was packaged
in the same enclosure as Sun's top of the line Motorola based Sun-3 servers.
- Sun started the
Florida SunFlash,
an email newsletter to keep partners, customers and internal Sun personnel up to
date with the rapid stream of Sun's new products.
- Sun, with other partners set up
SPARC International,
Inc as the industry body to disseminate technical information about SPARC,
and facilitate the licensing of technology and trademarks.
Sun introduced the SPARCstation 1, rated at 12.5 MIPS, 1.4
MFLOPS, about 3 times faster than the Sun-3 model it replaced. This blew away
all other competition on the desktop, because most competitors were still
waiting to get volume quantities of Motorola's 68040 chip, to replace their
68030 models. In fact the 68040 took a long time in coming, which forced many
workstation oem's to ship older models with the promise of a future upgrade.
The SPARCstation 1 was the first computer to include an SBus interface.
December 6, 1989,
Antares
Microsystems announced the industry's first 3rd party SBus cards.
These were:- the 10Base-2 Ethernet Controller, the SCSI-SNS Host Adapter, the
Parallel Port, and the 8-Channel Serial Controller.
- Sun introduced the SPARCstation 2, rated at 28.5 MIPS, 4.2 MFLOPS.
- Sun introduced the SPARCserver 600MP. This was Sun's first
multiprocessor machine, and was the last generation of computers from Sun to
include the VMEbus. However, each processor card also included 4 x SBus slots.
The 600MP processors ran at the same speed as the SPARCstation 2, but underlying
the design was the new
MBus architecture,
which enabled field upgrades to faster CPU's, when these became available in
subsequent years.
- Sun introduced the SPARCstation 10.. This was Sun's first desktop
multiprocessor machine, capable of having 1 to 4 CPU's.
Tadpole
Technology introduced the SPARCbook 1. The first true SPARC portable
running Sun-OS.
An
indication of how the SPARC compatible market had grown by this time, is that
the first edition of ACSL's SBus Product Directory included details of
over 75 oem's making SPARC computers and SBus cards, and over 300 products.
At the end of 1992, Sun launched the SPARCcenter 2,000
a 20 CPU capable datacenter server which remained Sun's flagship until 1996.
- Cray Research launched the SuperServer 6400. A datacenter server
with 64 x CPU capability.
ICL previewed its GoldRush Megaserver, also a 64 CPU capable server,
originally rated at 6,000 transactions/second.
Chip manufacturer Weitek (now part of Rockwell) introduced the SPARC
power microP, a user installable CPU upgrade with clock doubling technology
aimed at customers of SPARCstation 2's, and IPX's. These competed directly with
Sun's own board swap upgrade program, and showed that the installed base of
SPARC computers had reached a critical mass.
- ICL did the largest ever rollout of new SPARC server products, with its
teamserver and superserver product lines, with integral RAID
capability, with every model rated in transactions/second.
Integrated Micro Products (IMP) launched the FT-SPARC the
first SPARC computer to be designed from the chips upwards as a genuinely fault
tolerant architecture.
Sun replaced the SPARCstation 10 family with the similar, but higher
performance SPARCstation 20.
Ross Technology announced hyperSPARC CPU's as user installable
competitive upgrades to earlier MBus machines from Sun. In later years,
hyperSPARC and Sun's own superSPARC competed for MBus slots in the factory as
well as the installed base. Later that year, Sun started to include hyperSPARC
models as alternative choices in its SS-20 family.
- Fujitsu owned HAL Computer launched the industry's first workstations based
on a 64 bit CPU, HAL's own SPARC64.
Shortly after HAL's announcement, Sun finally launched the long expected
Ultra 1, and 2 workstations which used Sun's 64 bit UltraSPARC
processor.
From the 1995 edition of the SPARC
Product Directory...
Launched in Q4 95, the Ultra 1 and 2 were
the start of a new generation of SPARC based workstations and servers from Sun
Microsystems. These models are positioned as high performance workstations, with
intrinsic memory and processor performance above the SPARCstation 20 class,
which has been discontinued by Sun.
The most obvious architectural feature is that the Ultra range uses
the 64 bit UltraSPARC processor. The wider databus provides
intrinsically faster performance than a 32 bit CPU at the same clock speed, but
Sun has optimised the performance of the dataflows in the CPU to extract
significant performance gains compared to previous SuperSPARC and HyperSPARC
implementations. Additionally, the new visual instruction set (VIS)
includes hardware for visual manipulation which was previously only available on
external boards. Building these features into the CPU supports very high levels
of graphics performance. There is no MBus in the Ultra machines.
Processors, I/O and RAM connect via a crossbar switched interconnect which Sun
calls UltraSPARC Port Architecture (UPA). SBus has been retained as the
I/O expansion interface in these models. As with previous Sun models, there's
room in the basic system design to support faster processors (up to and beyond
300MHz).
Ultra 1 model 140 model 170 - Single processor workstations
with 64 bit UltraSPARC CPU. Model 140, 143MHz CPU, delivers 215 SPECint_92, and
303 SPECfp_92. Model 170, 167MHz CPU, delivers 252 SPECint_92, 351 SPECfp_92.
RAM 8 SIMM sockets provide up to 512M. Graphics options:- in addition to the
usual SBus graphics available on previous Sun models, the Ultra 1 is supported
by a new family of Creator, or Creator3D systems connected via the UPA. New 3D
RAM technology delivers upto 600M pixel operations/second.
Interfaces:- UPA (crossbar on motherboard), SBus (32/64 bit 60M bytes/sec),
SCSI-2 (10M bytes/sec basic models, 20M bytes/sec FastWide on Creator models).
Ethernet (10-BaseT for models 140, 170), (10-BaseT and 100-BaseT for 170E
Creator models). Parallel - Centronics compatible port DB25 connectors. Serial
I/O 2 x RS-232/RS423 with DB25. Audio 16 bit 8KHz to 48KHz, internal speaker,
external mike. Keyboard/mouse interface Sun 5, AT 101, or Unix. Internal drive
options:- 3.5" floppy, quad speed 644M Sun CD-ROM. Tape:- optional 4G or
8G DDS2 4mm, or 14G 8mm. Winchesters:- up to 2 x 3.5" x 1" (1G or 2G),
or 1 x 3.5" x 1.6" (4.2G). (3 SBus slots) Operating system - Solaris
2.5 or later.
Ultra 2 - Multiprocessor workstations with 64 bit UltraSPARC
CPU. Upto 2 x CPU's per system. Other features and interfaces as per the faster
options for the Ultra 1, 170E above. (4 SBus slots )
IDG
Launched SunWorld Online - the world's first independent Sun
publication on the web.
(The 1995 market review text below is
unchanged from the SPARC Product Directory published at that time.)
Market
Developments in 1995 - Q1 announcements
Sun Microsystems launched
two desktop models that redefined the entry level for SPARC based computers. The
SPARCstation 4, which replaced the SPARCclassic as Sun's lowest price entry
level desktop workstation, and the SPARC Xterminal 1 which replaced the
SPARCclassic X as Sun's lowest price desktop terminal. It's likely you would
only use the SPARC Xterminal 1 if you already have SPARC servers running
Solaris. But at a launch price $1,600 below the entry level workstation, it's a
serious contender for sensitive budgets.
In the past, X terminal customers who didn't need the high graphics
performance of CAD applications tended to go elsewhere for their desktop
terminal needs e.g. to HP,
NCD
or Tektronix. But as more SPARC servers are deployed in commercial database
applications, Sun can't ignore the business potential of large numbers of
terminal seats. The cost engineered features in this model (i.e. it doesn't have
the fastest processor from the SS-4 because most people don't need it) show that
Sun is taking this segment of its market more seriously, and would like to get
more of this kind of business.
General Imaging launched its Texas Instruments based TMS 320C80 SBus
Co-processor card. The S/IP80 card is designed for signal/image processing
applications. The TMS 320C80 is a single chip which includes 4 x 32 bit DSP
parallel processors running at 25MHz delivering up to 1 Billion operations per
second. If that wasn't quite enough, the card also includes an on-board video
digitizer. Multiple cards can be run as part of a software coherent system that
scales up to 30 billion operations per second.
Market Developments in 1995 - Q2 announcements
The
main event in this quarter was the SunWorld exhibition in San Francisco. The
trends seen in the products exhibited were evolutionary rather than
revolutionary. More vendors are now positioning their products for telecomms or
Internet use. Most vendors now have something to say about how their products
can address the needs for High Availability applications, although there are
still very few vendors who have complete solutions in this area.
Data/Ware launched the DW3300, an SBus to IBM Channel Interface.
This emulates an IBM 3088 adapter and enables an IBM mainframe running the MVS
operating system to transfer files and jobs to an attached SPARC host. Although
file transfers can operate in either direction, it's likely that the main use of
such a product will be to offload CPU intensive tasks from the mainframe.
However, there are also many organizations which still use their IBM mainframes
as the main repository for corporate data, and in those cases the transfers may
go the other way.
Market Developments in 1995 - Q3 announcements
The summer can be a quiet time for new product announcements, although
this year witnessed the biggest computer market launch ever, in the shape of
Microsoft's Windows 95 rollout. It's possible that most other computer vendors
wisely avoided doing anything in this time frame because they would have found
it hard to attract much attention in the glare of Microsoft's publicity.
Two announcements in the media world this quarter had special
significance to Sun users, the launch of SunFlash (aka FlashBack) as an
independent newsletter, and the launch on the world wide web of SunWorldOnLine.
Apart from the issue of timing, and the common theme of Sun related news, the
publications also share an editor, inasmuch as John J. McLaughlin the editor of
Flashback is also the new products editor for SunWorldOnLine.
The first of these announcements concerned changes in the structure
of the Internet based email newsletter called "SunFlash" (there's also
another variant called "FlashBack"). SunFlash had been running for
over 6 years as an in-house communications organ of Sun Microsystems. During the
summer, it became an independent commercially run news service, although its
editor John J. McLaughlin, remains at the helm.
The main effect for the 140,000+ people who receive this newsletter
is that independence from Sun will help to broaden out the coverage of products
and news, although it's reasonable to assume that most of the material will
still have a core based around Sun, Solaris or SPARC. If you don't get this news
service, you can get general information on how to subscribe by sending an email
to:
Flashback@FlashBack.COM with 9001 in the Subject line.
The second media announcement was the
launch
of a magazine called SunWorld Online on the world wide web. You can see
this magazine for yourself on: http://www.sun.com/sunworldonline
This new magazine is published by International Data Group (IDG), and
it's edited by much of the same team which produced Advanced Systems. The latter
is no longer available as a printed magazine. To quote from their own press
release...
..."SunWorld Online is heir to a line of print publications
dating back to 1988, when a renegade marketing group at Sun founded the
quarterly Sun Tech Journal. Sold to IDG in 1990, it became SunWorld, a monthly
magazine with a circulation of 72,000 plus editions in Japan and Great Britain.
In 1994 the name changed to Advanced Systems in order to broaden its
subscription base to 90,000 Unix readers. This May the decision was made to
become the first major computer magazine to go completely digital."
We wish both these new titles good luck, and hope that you'll get a
chance to have a look at them.
...Later:- 5 years later -
December 19, 2000
- SunWorld Online relaunched as UNIX Insider to reflect changing industry
trends. "UNIX has not been `just Solaris' for many years," said
UNIX Insider Executive Editor Joe Franklin in a letter to readers.
Market
Developments in 1995 - Q4 announcements
The quarter hadn't started as we went to press, but there's no doubt
that the most significant launch for users of SPARC systems will be the new
UltraSPARC based servers from Sun Microsystems. The UltraSPARC processor is a 64
bit CPU and ushers in the start of a new decade for SPARC systems. (The first
SPARC systems were shipped by Sun in 1987). Doubling the datapath from 32 to 64
bits would normally provide a potential doubling of performance (other factors
being equal) but as reported in earlier editions of this directory, the SPARC
Technology Business (STB) division of Sun has introduced intrinsic
architectural support for multi-media applications in addition to speeding up
the pre-existing processor cores. When the first systems ship, they will run
existing 32 bit Solaris application binaries from 3 to 6 times faster than
current SuperSPARC systems.
As you'd expect from any new processor, applications which are bounded
by the performance of a single processor will run a lot faster. But another
benefit, is that the new processors can address large physical RAM more
efficiently, so that Solaris users who have large databases (over 4G) or other
large data sets can look forward to a speed-up in running their applications and
can stop looking at competing products such as Digital Equipment's Alpha. Two
general factors of interest to current users, which may get lost in the hype
when the new UltraSPARC systems are launched.
1 - The I/O interface supported is SBus. (This is deduced from the
chip-set which accompanies the UltraSPARC. ) The consequence is that SBus will
remain a significant expansion technology for SPARC based systems for some years
still to come.
2 - The memory bandwidth of the first generation UltraSPARC is
already close to the maximum limit of the MBus, and any MBus based
implementation of this 64 bit processor would throw away most of the potential
performance gains. Therefore users shouldn't expect to see MBus based
enhancements to their existing systems (anytime soon) as they have already seen
with the HyperSPARC generation of upgrade products. However, upgrades may still
be expected in the traditional form of board or system level swaps.
The fact that UltraSPARC machines will need to be new designs rather
than modified MBus designs also means that there may be a delay before most
other vendors get their new 64 bit SPARC products to market.
STB has affirmed that some of the features which contribute to the
high performance of the 64 bit UltraSPARC (which is a 4 way superscaler design)
will trickle down to a future generation of low cost microSPARC III based
products. So whatever the performance level of your current SPARC systems, all
users will eventually benefit from the performance and increased market
confidence that arise from this launch. You'll also be able to hang on to your
investments in SBus cards and related software and reuse them in a new
generation of faster systems.
Retrospective... In fact Fujitsu owned HAL Computer, was the first
company to launch a 64 bit SPARC based computer, based on their own developed
SPARC64 processor. The HALstations were announced less than a month before Sun's
Ultra 1 and 2.
- Sun acquired IMP. The Sun-IMP business unit is expected to transfer its
fault-tolerant technologies within Sun's product range, and continue its strong
penetration in the telecoms market.
Sun acquired the SPARC business of Cray Systems, from its new owner
Silicon Graphics. These included the products, technolgies and customer base
associated with the SuperServer 6400 family.
Sun launched its family of Ultra Enterprise
servers which included configurations upto 30 x 64 bit CPU's, and 30 x
SBus channels. These Sun models, with an internal Gigaplane I/O bandwidth of 2.5
Gigabytes/second, set new standards of leadership for Unix datacenter servers.
Sun launched the JavaStation. A microSPARC based Network Computer,
at a price point below $1,000
Sun Microelectronics launched the SPARCengine Ultra AX. This was an
UltraSPARC based motherboard running Solaris with PCI-bus expansion, instead of
the usual SBus. This was the first time that the industry standard PCI-bus, from
the Intel PC world, appeared in a production SPARC based computer.
(The
1996 market review text below is unchanged from the SPARC Product Directory
published at that time.)
Market Developments in 1996 - Q1
announcements
In this period Sun came to the attention of a wider audience than
usual as a result of its reported attempt to purchase Apple Computer. If you
ignored the inevitable speculation about why Sun would want to buy Apple, the
real reasons for which is only known to a handful of people, you would still be
left with the conclusion that Sun Microsystems is now a large enough company and
has sufficient financial muscle to seriously contemplate acquiring any one of a
whole bunch of household names in the computer market if it really wanted to.
Although Sun is very well known in the server market, and millions of computer
users are connected via SPARC machines somewhere in their workplace, this was
the first time that many non technical people in the wider PC market became
aware of Sun as a significant player.
As we went to press, Silicon Graphics Inc (SGI) was making moves to
purchase Cray Research. Cray Research manufactures the "big brother"
of Sun's SPARCcenter 2000E, and this move would provide a useful extension to
SGI's product line. It's likely that SGI would be able to sell more of these
high end machines than Cray Research because it has a larger installed base, and
it's easier to work upwards than sell a point product at the top of the
performance range.
SPARC Technology Business, the division of Sun Microsystems which
develops new processors and markets technology at chip and board level to other
OEM's changed its name to Sun Microelectronics. The "Sun" brand is
more appropriate as this business now includes the marketing of Java chipsets
which are more strongly associated with Sun as a software standards developer.
SPARC workstation competitors Tatung Science and Technology Inc, and
Axil Computer both announced the availability of new workstations which
incorporate the 64 bit UltraSPARC processors from Sun Microelectronics. Tatung
customers can upgrade their COMPserver 20 products by replacing the processor
board. The Axil Ultima 1 family is shipping with Solaris 2.5.
While we're on the subject of go-faster hardware, this edition of the
directory includes a new contender for the title of fastest SBus disk interface.
Meltek Data's SBus Fibre Array controller claims 106M bytes/second
channel rate. More than just a fast
RAID, the Fibre Array,
also from Meltek supports multi-host connectivity, and potentially up to 450G
bytes of fault tolerant disk storage.
This quarter also saw a few cosmetic changes in this publication,
with the name change from the "SBus Product Directory" to the "SPARC
Product Directory." We also introduced a format change, so that instead of
printing different editions of the directory in Europe and the USA, at slightly
different intervals we've now got one edition, one cover and one paper size.
That's progress...
1997. The market's first
compact PCI
SPARC SBCs launched by
Force Computers.
ACSL published the
last ever printed edition of the
SPARC Product Directory and
completed the transition to the web format which had been started in the summer
of 1996.
1998. SPARC pioneer
Axil Computer
closes down operations.
1998. SPARC notebook makers Tadpole Technology and RDI Computer
merged to form Tadpole-RDI.
For the period January 2000 to
December 2006 - refer to the archived daily SPARC news in the right hand
column on this page. (You may have to make your browser window wider to see it -
and scroll up a bit.) |
 |
| It's
over 6 years since you last saw ads like the one above. See the article:-
Pre
Millenium SPARC Banner Ads from the SPARC Product Directory |
| Here are some other SPARC
history resource pages
| |
 |
| SPARC History |
Spellabyte and
Terrorbyte loved sitting around the campfire, discussing the good old days
of SPARC computing. | |
| . |
When
the first SPARC computers were launched, they were all single processor
systems...
A SPARC processor in 1987 was a 32 bit CPU clocked at
16.67MHz with a performance of about 10 integer MIPS and 1.6 MFLOPS.
The
1987 SPARC CPU chip was implemented in a Fujitsui 20k-gate, 1.3-micron CMOS
gate array.
The 2nd implementation was a full-custom 0.8-micron
design from
Cypress Semiconductor
and operated at 33 MHz and 20 MIPS.
...Thanks to Robert B Garner
who was lead architect of SPARC and co-designer of the Sun-4/200 - for
correcting the above information.
In 1995, the fastest SPARC
processors were the UltraSPARC models used in Sun's Ultra 1. These were 64 bit
CPU's with a clock speed of 167MHz providing a performance of 252 SPECint_92.
The way of measuring performance has changed but that's a speedup of over X20
for a single CPU, and over 1,000 times faster for a maximally configured
datacenter server.
After 10 years of development a SPARC mainframes
could have 60 or more processors installed. | |
| . |
...Later:-
in April 2007
Sun liked this SPARC History article so much
that they
copied
some of the text to use on their 25 Year Celebration site. But they didn't
include an attribution.
Naughty Sun! | |
| . |
Archived
SPARC news
below you can see thousands of
archived SPARC news stories which track daily developments in the SPARC
market from 2000 to the
present day. |
|
2007
September 2007 -
LEON3 SPARC Licensed for Space Missions
August 2007 - Sun
Ships UltraSPARC T2
July 2007 - Sun's
Results Show Failure to Leverage Storage
June
2007 - Sun Blade 6000 Launched
May 2007 - UMC to
Make Sun's SPARC Chips
April 2007 - ASCDI
Files Anti Competitive Complaint Against Sun
March 2007 - Sun
Resurrects STB
February
2007 - NextComputing Ships 1.6GHz SPARC Portable
January 2007 - Sun
Returns to Profitability
2006
December 2006 -
Previewing the Future of the SPARC Market
November 2006 -
Fujitsu's Next SPARC Chips
October 2006 - Sun
and Microsoft Promise OS Coexistence
September 2006 - SGI
Pulls the Plug on MIPS
August
2006 - Clerity Acquires Sun's Mainframe Rehosting Business
July 2006 - Running
SPARC / Solaris Apps on Intel Hardware
June 2006 - Sun Says
- 85% of the Fortune 500 Have Solaris 10
May
2006 - Why Solaris will Get 128 Bit Addresses
April
2006 - McNealy Gives Up the CEO Hot Seat at Sun
March 2006 - Sun
Releases Source of UltraSPARC T1 Processor
February 2006 - Sun
Embarks on Linux Port for SPARC
January 2006 - SPARC
Notebooks Get SSDs
2005
article:- Sun, SPARC
and Solaris Highlights and Lowlights in 2005
December 2005 - Sun
Announces OpenSPARC Market Initiatives
November 2005 -
Sun's New 8 Way SPARC Chip
October 2005 - Sun's
New Flagship SPARC Servers
September 2005 - Sun
Launches its Fastest SPARC Servers
August 2005 - SPARC
Notebook Maker Tadpole is Acquired
July 2005 -
FalconStor Announces Support for Solaris 10
June
2005 - Sun Acquires StorageTek
May
2005 - Sun and Dell Tie for 3rd Place in Server Revenue
April 2005 - Red Hat
Kicks Out Sun in Italian Bank
March
2005 - Solaris 10 Passes One Million Licenses Milestone
February 2005 -
Sun's Knockoff Ads Delusional - Says Article
January
2005 - BiTMICRO's E-DiskSAN Certified Solaris Ready
2004
article:- Sun, SPARC
and Solaris Highlights and Lowlights in 2004
December 2004 -
HP Gambles Another $3 Billion on Itanium 2
November 2004 -
Sun Missed the Server Revenue Growth Wave
October 2004 -
Sun to Resell Solid State Disks from TMS
September 2004 -
HP's Sun Eclipse Program
August 2004 - New
Sun Fire Speaks SPARC Solaris and Windows
July 2004 -
Intransa Ships 125th IP SAN to SPARC Solaris Customer
June 2004 -
Fujitsu's 1.9 GHz SPARC Processor
May 2004 - IDC
Says Sun Lost Out to Linux and Intel
April 2004 -Sun
Gains $1.6 billion from Dispute with Microsoft
March 2004 -
NatureTech Launches Dual 1.28GHz UltraSPARC Portable
February 2004 -
Mellanox, InfiniBand and Sun
January 1-14,
2004 - UltraSPARC notebook breaks the $2,000 barrier
January 15-31,
2004 - Force Announces Design Win for SPARC SBCs
2003
article:-
the Top #10 Most Important SPARC Manufacturers in 2003
December 2003 -
Sun Reaffirms Commitment to Solaris x86
November 2003 -
Tadpole Launches UltraSPARC-IIIi Notebook
October 2003 -
Sun Anticipates $1 Billion Loss for Quarter
September 1-14,
2003 - Gartner Nixes Linux on the Desktop
September 15
- 30, 2003 - Themis Servers Get 1.2 GHz UltraSPARC III
August -
weeks 1 - 4
July
-
weeks 1 - 4
June
weeks 1 - 4
May
-
weeks 1 - 4,
April
-
weeks 1 - 3,
week 4
March
-
weeks 1 - 2,
3 - 4,
February
-
weeks 1 - 2,
weeks 3 - 4
January
-
weeks 1 - 2,
weeks 3 - 4
2002
article:-
the Top #10 Most Important SPARC Manufacturers in 2002
December -
week 1,
weeks 2 - 4,
November -
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3-4,
October
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
September
-
weeks 1 - 2a,
weeks 2b - 3a,
weeks 3b - 4,
August
-
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3 - 4,
July
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
June
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
May
-
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3 - 4,
April -
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
March
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
February
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
January
-
weeks 1 - 2,
week 3,
week 4,
week 5,
2001
December -
week 1,
weeks 2 - 4,
November -
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3 to 4,
October -
weeks 1 - 2,
week 3,
week 4,
September
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
August
-
weeks 1 - 2,
weeks 3 - 4,
July -
weeks 1 & 2,
week 3,
week 4,
June
-
week 1,
weeks 2 & 3,
week 4,
May
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
April
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
March
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
February
-
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3 & 4,
January -
weeks 1 - 2,
week 3,
week 4,
2000
December -
week 1,
week 2,
weeks 3 - 4,
November
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
October
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
September
-
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
August
-
weeks 1 - 2,
week 3,
week 4,
July -
weeks 1 - 4,
June
- week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
May - week
1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4
April
- week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4,
March -
week 1,
week 2,
week 3,
week 4
February - week
1, week 2,
week 3,
week 4
January - week
2,
week 3,
week 4 | |
|
|
|
| . |
|
| |