|
I'm starting the New Year with a more
positive outlook on the prospects for Sun's SPARC server business. Methinks that
Sun's revenue will grow and that Sun is going to look smarter than its main
competitors (again).
No. It's not because I've found my white hairs
turning back to grey. And I haven't been eating mouldy old Christmas cake
(which can cause hallucinations) either. Here are my good solid reasons:-
- Sun's over dependence on ephemeral dotcom
companies is now ancient history.
The customers they've got now
are the same solid organizations in government, banking, manufacturing and
research which they had before the dotcom bubble. Their surviving telco and ISP
customers are the ones which made it with solid business plans. You're only as
good as your customers. Sun's customers are great companies. They have real
problems with increasing server demands, security risks, and reliability etc
which SPARC systems can solve quite well at a scalable price.
- Sun's rivals are going to falter in their
transition to 64 bit computing.
Sun's had its own fair share of
trouble in recent years trying to get more performance out of its 64 bit
servers. It seemed like every last drop had been squeezed out. But Sun had the
advantage that they've been doing this 64 bit OS stuff since 1996. They don't
have to solve every problem at once.
Sun's rivals in the Wintel camp
face the double whammy of trying to optimise everything at the same time with a
newish 64 bit platform. It takes some time to optimise all those software
tweaks and balances, and they're going to stumble and look pretty foolish while
they do it. Some Intel server companies are not going to succeed, and will
withdraw from the 64 bit race going back to safer proven 32 bit server
solutions. That will just increase confidence in the company which has been
doing it the longest. My guess is that Sun will introduce strategic 32 bit
(external bus) SPARC appliance processors to help out with those parts where
high megahertz does best. 2003 will be the long awaited year that SPARC servers
leapfrog the competition again. Not all the solutions will come from Sun. Their
partners will provide critical building blocks.
- HP's transient problems in absorbing Compaq
(which were blamed for their slowdown in business performance in 2002) will be
called something different as they take on a veneer of permanence in 2003.
Let's just call it "HP Stodge". Unlike
HP
Sauce (the #1 ketchup in the UK) which has a rich brown color, and is full
of flavor and goodness, HP Stodge is something which is gray, sticky and makes
your wheels spin more slowly.You can't run a company that size and which
consists of business units which are mostly #2 or #3 in their respective niches
and expect to get first class results. Integrating a company is no different to
integrating a computer system. You need best of breed components to build a best
of breed system. A lot of HP's business units are followers rather than leaders.
- InfiniBand is a
disruptive server technology and just what the company doctor prescribed.
Sun's
got a good track record of inventing, borrowing and running with new ideas in
server I/O connection technology. In the past it did a good job with SCSI,
then SBus (which gave Sun a lead of several years over PC makers until PCI came
along to do the same job) and Fibre-channel. This year Sun will hype and race
ahead with InfiniBand.
Sun didn't invent it. But Sun stands to gain the most from promoting high
performance servers at a low price, particularly if the low cost part is a 3rd
party add-on and doesn't affect the profit margin in Sun's part of the System.
Once the hype machine gets into play, you too will believe that an InfiniBand
server from Sun will be a safer choice, and that you'll get it working faster
than a similar server from everyone else. Am I
right?
Will we see a resurgence in Sun's fortunes in the year ahead?
Just keep your browser tuned to
our news pages
and you'll see how well these story lines play out. |
...Later
- Sun reported a $2.3 billion loss for its quarter ending December 29,
2002. But I remain bullish. See below.
Sun Microsystems Reports
Second Fiscal Quarter Results
SANTA
CLARA, Calif. - January 16, 2003 - Sun Microsystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUNW)
reported results today for its fiscal second quarter which ended December 29,
2002.
Revenues for the second quarter were $2.915 billion, a decline of 6%
as compared with $3.108 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2002. Total
gross margin as a percent of revenues was 43.3%, an increase of 6.7% as
compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2002. Net loss for the second quarter
of fiscal 2003 was $2.283 billion or $.72 net loss per share.
Net loss
for the second quarter includes a $2.125 billion expense related to the
impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets. In addition, Sun recognized
in the second quarter $357 million in expense related to previously announced
restructuring actions. Excluding these items, as well as an in-process research
and development expense of $4 million, losses on equity investments of $11
million and the related tax benefit of $204 million for all of these items, net
income for the quarter was $10 million, slightly better than break-even on a per
share basis. This compares with a net loss excluding special items of $99
million for the second quarter of fiscal 2002.
On a sequential basis,
revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2003 increased $168 million or six
percent from the first quarter. Gross margin as a percent of revenue for the
second quarter increased 2.1 percentage points from the overall gross margin
percentage in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Net loss for the second quarter
increased $2.172 billion from the net loss of $111 million for the first quarter
of fiscal 2003, primarily due to the impairment of intangible assets and
restructuring charges. Net loss excluding special items improved $88 million
from a net loss of $78 million to a net income of $10 million.
...Sun
Microsystems profile
Editor's comments:- although Sun's
quarterly revenue takes it back to where it was in 1999, that's still a lot
better than I expected in the darkest days of 2002 when I was worried that Sun
was "sliding towards being a $10 Billion company." That's unlikely to
happen anytime soon. And I think that, from now, on we may see some year on year
revenue parity, or even growth.
Sun's huge $2 billion loss for the
quarter looks scary. But this is a one off accounting adjustment. A lot of
companies will have to make this kind of correction because of new accounting
rules. The underlying reality is that with a 20% smaller headcount than its
peak, Sun can still be profitable as a $12 billion a year company. I haven't
changed my upbeat assessment of Sun's prospects for 2003. |
| . |
SQL
Slammer Web Virus Provides Strong Sales Pitch for Sun Servers
January 27, 2003 - there was a great advert today for Solaris caused by the
shutdown of thousands of web sites worldwide due to the SQL Slammer virus which
attacked Microsoft based servers.
Microsoft says that a
patch for the SQL
Server 2000 vulnerability was released as long ago as July 2002.
Nevertheless millions of users have been unable to access web sites today
because of this server based virus.
Is there a market for higher priced
web hosting based on higher security infrastructure?
My guess is -
yes. Maybe Sun should make more marketing capital out of this issue.
It's
unlikely that other major Unix server vendors such as HP or IBM will use this
incident to talk up the superiority of Unix derivatives over Microsoft servers.
That would jeopardize their relationships with Microsoft.
If you were a
marketing manager in Sun the SQL Slammer incident is just the kind of thing
you'd dream about as a good pretext for going back to diehard Microsoft server
shops and talking about the SPARC/Solaris proposition. |
| . |
|
| |